Barnett v. City of Lafayette et al

Filing 58

Stipulation and ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 10/08/10. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2010)

Barnett v. City of Lafayette et al

Doc. 58

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Mark E. Merin (State Bar No. 043849) W. Gordon Kaupp (State Bar No. 226141) LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 2001 P Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, California 95811 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] E-Mail: [e-mail] Andrew C. Schwartz, SBN 64578 CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK 2121 North California Blvd., Suite 1020 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Email: Attorneys for Plaintiffs James V. Fitzgerald, III, SBN 55632 MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER & BORGES, LLP 1211 Newell Avenue Post Office Box 5288 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROSALETY BARNETT, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF LAFAYETTE, CITY OF LAFAYETTE POLICE OFFICERS, sued herein as DOES 1 and 2, and ROES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. \\\ \\\ \\\ 1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Rosalety Barnett vs. City of Lafayette, et al.; USDC, Northern District, Case No. C 04-05365 TEH

CASE NO: C 04-05365 TEH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties herein, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that the above action and the complaint for damages filed on December 20, 2004, be and hereby is DISMISSED, and that each party shall bear their costs of suit incurred herein, including attorneys' fees. DATED: October 4, 2010 Respectfully Submitted, LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN and CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK /s/ - "Mark E. Merin" Mark E. Merin Attorneys for Plaintiffs

By:

DATED: October 4, 2010

Respectfully Submitted,

MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER & BORGES, LLP

By:

/s/ - "James V. Fitzgerald, III" James V. Fitzgerald, III Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER It is so ORDERED. DATED:

Ju

ER

N

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Rosalety Barnett vs. City of Lafayette, et al.; USDC, Northern District, Case No. C 04-05365 TEH

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

lton E. H dge The

enderso

n

R NIA

______________________________________ The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California

UNIT ED

10/08/10

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

NO

RT

H