Alexander et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al

Filing 102

ORDER re 101 Notice of briefing schedule of early MSJ filed by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/6/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015)

Download PDF
Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101 Filed04/02/15 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CAROLYN KUBOTA (SBN 113660) ckubota@omm.com SCOTT M. VOELZ (SBN 181415) svoelz@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Tel: (213) 430-6000 Fax: (213) 430-6407 Attorneys for Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 Case No: 3:05-cv-38 EMC DEAN ALEXANDER, et al. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER vs. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., et al., Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen Defendant. 18 19 Pursuant to the Court’s instructions at the March 26, 2015 case management conference, 20 defendant FedEx Ground Package System submits as Exhibit A the attached Proposed Case 21 Management Order setting forth the Court’s ruling. FedEx has met and conferred with Plaintiffs 22 and they have no objection to the Proposed Order. 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101 Filed04/02/15 Page2 of 2 1 2 Dated: April 2, 2015 By: /s/ Scott Voelz Carolyn Kubota Scott M. Voelz 3 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Tel: (213) 430-6000 4 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101-1 Filed04/02/15 Page1 of 3 EXHIBIT A Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101-1 Filed04/02/15 Page2 of 3 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 5 6 DEAN ALEXANDER, et al. 7 8 Case No: 3:05-cv-38 EMC Plaintiffs, vs. [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 9 10 11 FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., et al., Defendant. 12 13 14 In the above-captioned matter, plaintiffs and defendant FedEx Ground Package System, 15 Inc. (“FXG”) submitted a Joint Case Management Statement (Dckt # 94) on March 19, 2015, and 16 appeared for a case management conference on March 26. Having reviewed the parties’ joint 17 statement and discussed their positions regarding appropriate pretrial proceedings, the Court 18 determines that certain issues regarding the scope of recoverable damages and the definitions of 19 the class and the overtime subclass, should be decided before formal discovery and further 20 proceedings in this case. 21 22 23 Accordingly, the Court orders the following schedule for briefing and argument of the motions described below: (1) a motion by FXG to clarify the class definitions with respect to the requirement that 24 class members “drove a vehicle on a full-time basis (meaning exclusive of time off for 25 commonly excused employment absences)” 26 (2) a motion by FXG to limit plaintiffs’ recoverable damages period; and 27 (3) a motion by FXG to limit plaintiffs’ recovery for certain categories of work-related 28 expenses under Sections 221–224, and 2802 of the California Labor Code. 1 [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101-1 Filed04/02/15 Page3 of 3 1 3 4 5 Event / Item Due Date / Deadline Defendant’s Motions Due May 14, 2015 Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to Motions Due 2 June 25, 2015 Defendants’ Replies to Motions Due July 15, 2015 Motions Heard July 30, 2015 6 The parties are ordered to further meet and confer with regard to these motions prior to ER H 14 RT 13 EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge en d M. Ch e Edwar Judg NO 12 15 R NIA 11 D RDERE IS SO O T I______________________________ FO 10 S DISTRICT TE C TA LI Dated: 4/6/15 UNIT ED 9 S filing. RT U O 8 A 7 N F D IS T IC T O R C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?