Alexander et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
Filing
102
ORDER re 101 Notice of briefing schedule of early MSJ filed by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/6/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015)
Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101 Filed04/02/15 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CAROLYN KUBOTA (SBN 113660)
ckubota@omm.com
SCOTT M. VOELZ (SBN 181415)
svoelz@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
400 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Tel: (213) 430-6000
Fax: (213) 430-6407
Attorneys for Defendant
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM,
INC.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
Case No: 3:05-cv-38 EMC
DEAN ALEXANDER, et al.
NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF
PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT
ORDER
vs.
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM,
INC., et al.,
Judge:
Hon. Edward M. Chen
Defendant.
18
19
Pursuant to the Court’s instructions at the March 26, 2015 case management conference,
20
defendant FedEx Ground Package System submits as Exhibit A the attached Proposed Case
21
Management Order setting forth the Court’s ruling. FedEx has met and conferred with Plaintiffs
22
and they have no objection to the Proposed Order.
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
NOTICE OF SUBMISSION
NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC
Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101 Filed04/02/15 Page2 of 2
1
2
Dated: April 2, 2015
By: /s/ Scott Voelz
Carolyn Kubota
Scott M. Voelz
3
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
400 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Tel: (213) 430-6000
4
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant FedEx Ground
Package System, Inc.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
NOTICE OF SUBMISSION
NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC
Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101-1 Filed04/02/15 Page1 of 3
EXHIBIT A
Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101-1 Filed04/02/15 Page2 of 3
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
5
6
DEAN ALEXANDER, et al.
7
8
Case No: 3:05-cv-38 EMC
Plaintiffs,
vs.
[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT
ORDER
9
10
11
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM,
INC., et al.,
Defendant.
12
13
14
In the above-captioned matter, plaintiffs and defendant FedEx Ground Package System,
15
Inc. (“FXG”) submitted a Joint Case Management Statement (Dckt # 94) on March 19, 2015, and
16
appeared for a case management conference on March 26. Having reviewed the parties’ joint
17
statement and discussed their positions regarding appropriate pretrial proceedings, the Court
18
determines that certain issues regarding the scope of recoverable damages and the definitions of
19
the class and the overtime subclass, should be decided before formal discovery and further
20
proceedings in this case.
21
22
23
Accordingly, the Court orders the following schedule for briefing and argument of the
motions described below:
(1) a motion by FXG to clarify the class definitions with respect to the requirement that
24
class members “drove a vehicle on a full-time basis (meaning exclusive of time off for
25
commonly excused employment absences)”
26
(2) a motion by FXG to limit plaintiffs’ recoverable damages period; and
27
(3) a motion by FXG to limit plaintiffs’ recovery for certain categories of work-related
28
expenses under Sections 221–224, and 2802 of the California Labor Code.
1
[PROPOSED] CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER
NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC
Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101-1 Filed04/02/15 Page3 of 3
1
3
4
5
Event / Item Due
Date / Deadline
Defendant’s Motions Due
May 14, 2015
Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to Motions Due
2
June 25, 2015
Defendants’ Replies to Motions Due
July 15, 2015
Motions Heard
July 30, 2015
6
The parties are ordered to further meet and confer with regard to these motions prior to
ER
H
14
RT
13
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg
NO
12
15
R NIA
11
D
RDERE
IS SO O
T
I______________________________
FO
10
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
LI
Dated: 4/6/15
UNIT
ED
9
S
filing.
RT
U
O
8
A
7
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER
NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?