Schmidt v. Contra Costa County et al

Filing 80

ORDER extending time to respond to Plaintiff's request for production of documents to 1/25/2010. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 1/11/2010. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 DENISE SCHMIDT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Wiley Price & Radulovich, LLP [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Request for Production Case No. C-05-00197 VRW E-Filing

Case No. C-05-00197 VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, KEN TORRE, LAUREL BRADY, THOMAS MADDOCK, LOIS HAIGHT, and BARRY BASKIN,

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JOSEPH E. WILEY (State Bar No. 84154) JOAN PUGH NEWMAN (State Bar No. 148562) WILEY PRICE & RADULOVICH, LLP 1301 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 310 Alameda, California 94501 [phone] FAX [phone] Attorneys for Defendants KEN TORRE, LAUREL BRADY, THOMAS MADDOCK, LOIS HAIGHT, and BARRY BASKIN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION DENISE SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, KEN TORRE, LAUREL BRADY, THOMAS MADDOCK, LOIS HAIGHT, and BARRY BASKIN, Defendants. Case No. C-05-00197 VRW ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINITIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the Court Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Requests for Production of Documents is extended to January 25, 2010.
11 DATED: January __, 2010
S DISTRICT TE C _____________________________________ TA

UNIT ED

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker United States District Court Judge
S

RT U O

TED GRAN

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

1
Wiley Price & Radulovich, LLP Order Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Request for Production Case No. C-05-00197 VRW E-Filing

A

C

LI

aughn R Judge V

FO

Walker

R NIA

NO

RT

H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PROOF OF SERVICE I am a citizen of the United States, employed in the County of Alameda, California, over the age of 18 years, and am not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is 1301 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 310, Alameda, California 94501. On the date set forth below, I served the following document(s) by the method indicated below: [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION First Class Mail by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Alameda, California addressed as set forth below pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §1013(a). I am readily familiar with the business practice at Wiley Price & Radulovich, LLP for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Correspondence so collected and processed is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. Mr. Geoffrey M. Faust Law Office of P.O. Box 751 Clayton, California 94517 Tel: Fax: [phone] [phone] Ms. Monika L. Cooper County Counsel Office of the County Counsel, Contra Costa 651 Pine Street, 9th Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on January 5, 2010, at Alameda, California. /s/ Magnolia D. Vinluan

2
Wiley Price & Radulovich, LLP Order Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Request for Production Case No. C-05-00197 VRW E-Filing