Henderson et al v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 442

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSEShow Cause Response due by 4/13/2009.(vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EARNEST HENDERSON, JANEL GOTTA, AARON RAULS, MICHAEL PEREZ, ARTURO PLEITEZ, Plaintiffs, v CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES, SHERIFF MICHAEL HENNESSEY, DEPUTY GLENN YOUNG, DEPUTY MIGUEL PRADO, DEPUTY LARRY NAPATA, AND DOES 1-11, Defendants. / No C 05-0234 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On February 17, 2009, plaintiffs' counsel moved to withdraw as counsel to Janel Gotta due to what counsel perceived to be a conflict of interest that developed during the course of settlement negotiations. Doc #436 at 4. Plaintiffs' counsel

stated that he has "been unable to maintain contact with Ms Gotta." Id. Accordingly, plaintiff Janel Gotta is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing not later than April 13, 2009, why this motion to

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

withdraw should not be granted.

Counsel for plaintiff is directed

to ensure that this order to show cause is served on Gotta and to file proof of service with the court not later than March 27, 2009.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge

2