Guizar v. Woodford et al

Filing 91

CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of H. McEnroe, M. Coziahr, S. James, S. C. Wohlend, V. Marshall against Fernando Guizar. Defendants James & Wohlwends motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED.Defendant Coziahr is hereby DISMISSED from this action without prejudice under Rule 4(m). (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
FERNANDO GUIZAR,
No. CV-05-0557 MMC (PR)

6
7

Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

8

v.

9
J. WOODFORD, et al.,
10
Defendants.
/

11
12

() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues
13

have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
14

(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The
15

issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
16

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
17

Defendants James & Wohlwend’s motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED.
18

Defendant Coziahr is hereby DISMISSED from this action without prejudice
19

under Rule 4(m).
20
21
22

Dated: December 1, 2011

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

23
24

By: Tracy Lucero
Deputy Clerk

25
26
27
28