USA v. Peretti et al
Filing
25
ORDER REOPENING CASE and setting case management conference. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/06/06. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2006)
USA v. Peretti et al
Doc. 25
Case 3:05-cv-00617-TEH
Document 25
Filed 01/06/2006
Page 1 of 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, NO. C05-0617 TEH ORDER REOPENING CASE AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
ALFRED P. PERETTI, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
On October 7, 2005, this Court entered an order of dismissal following the parties'
12 notification that they had reached a settlement. The Court's order provided that the case 13 would be restored to calendar to be set for trial if, within ninety days, any party certified to 14 the Court that the agreed consideration for the settlement had not been delivered. 15 Plaintiff United States of America filed such a certification on January 5, 2006, the
16 ninetieth day following the Court's dismissal. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 17 the Clerk shall reopen this case, and that the parties shall appear for a case management 18 conference on Monday, March 6, 2006, at 1:30 PM. The parties shall meet and confer and 19 file a joint case management conference statement on or before Monday, February 27, 20 2006. If consideration for the settlement is delivered prior to that date, the parties shall so 21 inform the Court in a joint statement, and this case shall be closed. If consideration for the 22 settlement is not delivered, then the parties shall be prepared to proceed to trial as soon after 23 the March 6, 2006 case management conference as the Court's calendar will allow. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: 01/06/06 28 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?