Dunlap v. Randow et al

Filing 53

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/26/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HENRY F. DUNLAP, vs. C.O. RANDOW, Defendant. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 05-665 JSW (PR) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL The parties hereto, by counsel, have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this action. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within 120 days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order and Judgment shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 26, 2009 JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 26, 2009 Henry F. Dunlap P.O. Box 600 V23360 Tracy, CA 95378-0600 DUNLAP, Plaintiff, v. RANDOW et al, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case Number: CV05-00665 JSW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on May 26, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?