Gutierrez v. Kane et al

Filing 30

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2010)

Download PDF
Gutierrez v. Kane et al Doc. 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. A.P. KANE and BOARD OF PRISONS TERMS COMMISSIONERS, Respondents. / JOSEPH P. GUTIERREZ, Petitioner, No. C 05-1537 SI ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA The mandate has issued in the case, and petitioner has filed a pro se "application for appointment of counsel on evidentiary hearing." Although petitioner was previously represented by counsel, the Court has been informed by counsel (Michael Satris Esq.) that he will not be representing petitioner on remand. The Court directs Mr. Satris to file a formal notice of withdrawal. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3006A(g), the Court finds it appropriate to appoint new counsel to represent petitioner on remand. The Court will refer this matter to the Federal Public Defender to find representation for petitioner. The Court will wait until notified by the Federal Public Defender's office as to which attorney will represent petitioner to schedule a case management conference. When the Court holds a case management conference, the Court will discuss the necessity, if any, of an evidentiary hearing, and set a briefing schedule. (Docket Nos. 24 & 28). The Clerk shall serve this order on petitioner, respondents, Mr. Satris, and the Federal Public Defender's office. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 14, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?