Pollock v. Martel
Filing
109
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/31/2023)
Case 3:05-cv-01870-SI Document 109 Filed 01/31/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MILTON RAY POLLOCK,
Case No. 05-cv-01870-SI
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Petitioner,
12
v.
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
13
14
JAMES HILL, Warden,
Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Re: Dkt. No. 108
Having reviewed the parties’ proposed Case Management Order, the Court directs the
parties as follows:
18
(1) Respondent shall lodge the state court record by February 10, 2023.
19
(2) Petitioner shall file an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by June 22, 2023.
20
(3) Respondent shall file his Answer to Petitioner’s Amended Writ of Habeas Corpus by
21
January 29, 2024.
22
(4) Petitioner shall file his Reply to Respondent’s Answer to Petitioner’s Amended Petition
23
for Writ of Habeas Corpus by April 29, 2024.
24
(5) Respondent shall file a Supplemental Brief on the Application of Procedural Bars by
25
July 29, 2024.
26
(6) Petitioner shall file his Response to Respondent’s Supplemental Brief on the
27
Application of Procedural Bars by October 28, 2024.
28
(7) Respondent shall file his Reply to Respondent’s Response to his Supplemental Brief on
Case 3:05-cv-01870-SI Document 109 Filed 01/31/23 Page 2 of 2
1
the Application of Procedural Bars by January 27, 2025.
2
(8) Subsequent briefing will be scheduled once the Court issues a ruling on Petitioner’s
3
Supplemental Brief on the Application of Procedural Bars.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: January 31, 2023
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?