Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Sunbeam Corporation

Filing 46

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 37 Motion to Amend/Correct ; Plaintiff is required to E-FILE the amended document (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2006)

Download PDF
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Sunbeam Corporation Doc. 46 Case 3:05-cv-01974-PJH Document 46 Filed 04/05/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ) AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) v. ) ) ) SUNBEAM CORPORATION, and ) DOES 1-25, ) ) Defendant(s). ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C05-1974 BZ ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT On February 17, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Defendant Sunbeam has not filed an opposition, and there is no evidence of frivolity, bad faith or prejudice to the other parties sufficient to overcome the strong policy in favor of granting leave to amend pleadings. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a); Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, 316 F.3d 1048, 1051 (9th Cir. 2003). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to file the second amended complaint attached as exhibit A to its motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall serve the complaint on A status conference any additional defendants by May 1, 2006. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:05-cv-01974-PJH Document 46 Filed 04/05/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 is scheduled for June 12,2006. status report by June 5, 2006. The parties shall file a joint The hearing on plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint presently scheduled for April 5, 2006, is VACATED. Dated: April 5, 2006 Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\SAFECO\AMENDEDCOMPL.ORD.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?