Moyle et al v. Contra Costa County et al

Filing 150

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR RESETTING OF EXPEDITED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case management conference date of 3/5/10 at 1:30 PM has been advanced to 3/4/10 at 1:30 PM. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/24/10. (klh, COURT STAFF)

Download PDF
Case3:05-cv-02324-JCS Document149 Case3:05-cv-02324-JCS Document147 Filed02/24/10 Filed02/22/10 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN Mark E. Merin, SBN 043849 Cathleen A. Williams, SBN 068029 W. Gordon Kaupp, SBN 226141 2001 P Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, California 95811 Telephone: (916) 443-6911 Facsimile: (916) 447-8336 E-Mail: mark@markmerin.com CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK Andrew C. Schwartz, SBN 064578 2121 North California Blvd., Suite 1020 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Telephone: (925) 947-1147 Facsimile: (925) 947-1131 E-Mail: Schwartz@cmslaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RUSSELL MOYLE, a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, his custodial parent, RHONDA BOWERS; KATHERINE ERMITANO, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, her custodial parent, MARLON ERMITANO, and on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY; CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT; CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER LIONEL CHATMAN, in his official capacity; CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CHIEF DEPUTY PROBATION OFFICER FOR JUVENILE HALL, NANCY MILLER, in her official capacity; and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, Defendants. Case No. C05-02324 JCS PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR A RESETTING OF THE EXPEDITED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER DATE: TIME: CTRM: JUDGE: March 5, 2010 1:30 p.m. A, 15th Floor Hon. Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate TO THE HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO AND TO COUNSEL: On February 22, 2010, counsel for plaintiffs learned that the Court had set an expedited Case Management Conference in the above-captioned matter for 1:30 p.m. on March 5, 2010. Unfortunately both of Plaintiff's Class Counsel are scheduled to be out of town on that date. Mark Merin will be in 1 PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR A RESETTING OF THE EXPEDITED CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER Moyle, et al. vs. Contra Costa County, et al.; USDC, No. Dist., Case No. C 05-02324 JCS Case3:05-cv-02324-JCS Document149 Case3:05-cv-02324-JCS Document147 Filed02/24/10 Filed02/22/10 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Tucson taking depositions in a federal case pending in Arizona District Court and is scheduled to depart for Tucson from Sacramento at 2:05 p.m. on March 4, 2010. Andrew Schwartz is scheduled to be in trial in Los Angeles. I could be available in the morning of March 4, 2010, for an expedited Case Management Conference; I could also be available Friday, March 12, 2010. Although I am scheduled to start trial in Yolo County on March 9, 2010, I believe the court will be "dark" on Fridays and will, therefore, be able to attend a Case Management Conference on that date. Certainly, March 19, 2010, is available for both of Plaintiffs' Class Counsel. If the Court is not inclined to alter the date now set for the Expedited Case Management Conference, I ask that I be permitted to appear by telephone ­ although it is not ideal to handle matters such as this by telephone ­ at a specific time so that I can adjourn the depositions to participate by telephone. DATED: February 22, 2010 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN and CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK /s/ - "Mark E. Merin" MARK E. MERIN, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiffs By: [PROPOSED] ORDER March 4 Good cause appearing, the Expedited Case Management Conference is reset to __________, 1:30 p 2010, at _______ __.m. UNIT ED ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Feb. 24, 2010 S Hon. Joseph C. Spero Magistrate Judge, Joseph C. Spero District Court United States Judge Northern District of California ER N F D IS T IC T O R 2 PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR A RESETTING OF THE EXPEDITED CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER Moyle, et al. vs. Contra Costa County, et al.; USDC, No. Dist., Case No. C 05-02324 JCS A C LI FO R NIA NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?