Strom v. Scios, Inc. et al

Filing 82

ORDER re: Filing of Second Amended Answer re 81 Stipulation filed by Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Scios, Inc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/23/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2010)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP John M. Potter (Bar No. 165843) 2 johnpotter@quinnemanuel.com Josh A. Cohen (Bar No. 217853) 3 joshcohen@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 5 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 Christopher Tayback (Bar No. 145532) christayback@quinnemanuel.com 7 Ashley E. Martabano (Bar No. 236357) ashleymartabano@quinnemanuel.com 8 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 9 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants SCIOS, INC. AND JOHNSON & JOHNSON 12 13 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES ex rel STROM, 18 19 vs. Plaint iffs, CASE NO. C 05-3004 CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF SECOND AMENDED ANSWER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 6 20 SCIOS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 00459.50991/3376599.1 & RESETTING CASE Defendants. CASE NO. C 05-3004 CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF SECOND AMENDED ANSWER 1 2 3 STIPULATION WHEREAS the United States filed its Complaint in this matter on June 11, 2009; WHEREAS Defendants Scios, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson filed a First Amended Answer 4 on February 5, 2010; 5 WHEREAS the First Amended Answer contains an Eleventh Affirmative Defense of 6 reliance on advice of counsel; 7 WHEREAS Defendants have elected to dismiss and/or waive with prejudice the Eleventh 8 Affirmative Defense of reliance on advice of counsel; 9 10 The undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Defendants shall be permitted to file 11 a Second Amended Answer to the United States' Complaint that removes the Eleventh 12 Affirmative Defense of reliance on advice of counsel. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP By /s/ Christopher Tayback CHRISTOPHER TAYBACK Attorneys for Defendants Scios, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson 14 Dated: March 16, 2010 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 00459.50991/3376599.1 Dated: March 16, 2010 By /s/ Sara Winslow SARA WINSLOW JULIE A. ARBUCKLE Assistant United States Attorneys CASE NO. C 05-3004 CRB -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF SECOND AMENDED ANSWER 1 Dated: March 16, 2010 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 00459.50991/3376599.1 MOTION By /s/ Renee Orleans RENÉE S. ORLEANS KIMBERLY FRIDAY Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice Dated: March 16, 2010 NOLAN & AUERBACH, P.A. LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW PAVONE, Esq. By /s/ Matthew Pavone MATTHEW PAVONE Attorneys for Relator Joe Strom ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered. Defendants may file their Second Amended Answer. Defendants' Eleventh Affirmative Defense of reliance on advice of counsel is waived and dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: March ___, 2010 UNIT ED CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ED S S DISTRICT TE C _______T______________________ _A RT U O ER N F D IS T IC T O R CASE NO. C 05-3004 CRB -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF SECOND AMENDED ANSWER A C LI FO harle Judge C s R. Bre yer R NIA OO IT IS S RDER NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?