Houston et al v. Cintas Corporation
Filing
37
ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING RE: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT NOTICE, OF PUTATIVE CLASS CLAIMS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/18/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LARRY HOUSTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CINTAS CORPORATION, Defendant. / The Court has received the Unopposed Motion for Approval of Dismissal Without Prejudice and Without Notice of Putative Class Claims of Plaintiffs Robert Ramirez, Jose Salcedo, Larry Houston, Clifton E. Cooper, James Morgan, and A. Shappelle Thompson. The Court has reviewed the papers, the record in this case, and relevant legal authority. The Court HEREBY ORDERS the parties to file a supplemental brief addressing the issue of why putative class members would not be prejudiced by dismissal of the Morgan class claims, given the differences in remedies available under Title VII and Section 1981. The parties' supplemental brief shall be due by no later than April 3, 2009, and shall not exceed five (5) pages. IT IS SO ORDERED. No. C 05-3145 JSW ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING RE UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT NOTICE, OF PUTATIVE CLASS CLAIMS
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: March 18, 2009
JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?