The County of Santa Clara v. Astra USA, Inc et al

Filing 683

FURTHER ORDER CLARIFYING THIRD AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE NON-PARTY SUBPOENAS. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 5, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2010)

Download PDF
The County of Santa Clara v. Astra USA, Inc et al Doc. 683 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ASTRA USA, INC., ASTRA ZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, EVENTS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAYER CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, PFIZER, INC., SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ZENECCA, INC., ZLB BEHRING LLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GLAXO SMITHKLINE, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California No. C 05-03740 WHA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FURTHER ORDER CLARIFYING THIRD AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE NON-PARTY SUBPOENAS To be clear, the two subpoenas to non-party entities may cover more than two drugs so that a subpoena to Kaiser, for example, can cover drugs produced by multiple defendants so long as the overall subpoena is reasonable and non-burdensome. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 5, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?