The County of Santa Clara v. Astra USA, Inc et al

Filing 740

ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING DECISION FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 30, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2010)

Download PDF
The County of Santa Clara v. Astra USA, Inc et al Doc. 740 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING DECISION FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT - Case No. C-05-03740-WHA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. ASTRA USA, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 05-03740 WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING DECISION FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, on April 21, 2010, defendants filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, Case No. 09-1273, from a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Case No. 06-16471; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2010, the United States Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree that this action shall be stayed pending the resolution of Case No. 09-1273 in the United States Supreme Court. Counsel for defendants Astra USA, Inc., AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and Zeneca Inc. will inform this Court within three days of the issuance of the Supreme Court's opinion, and the Court shall schedule a Case Management Conference in this action within two weeks thereafter. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September 29, 2010 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP By /s/ Sharon D. Mayo Sharon D. Mayo Attorneys for Defendants Astra USA, Inc., AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, and Zeneca, Inc. Dated: September 29, 2010 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP By /s/ Brian W. Shaffer Brian W. Shaffer Attorneys for Defendant Pfizer, Inc. Dated: September 29, 2010 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP By /s/ Robert J. McCully Robert J. McCully Attorneys for Defendants ZLB Behring, LLC and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dated: September 29, 2010 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP By /s/ Scott D. Stein Scott D. Stein Attorneys for Defendant Bayer Corp. Dated: September 29, 2010 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP By /s/ Kirke M. Hasson Kirke M. Hasson Attorneys for Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. (f/k/a/ Schering-Plough Corporation) -1- [STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING DECISION FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT - Case No. C-05-03740-WHA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 29, 2010 DECHERT LLP By /s/ Frederick G. Herrold Frederick G. Herrold Attorneys for Defendants Smithkline Beecham Corporation and Smithkline Beecham Corporation d/b/a/ Glaxo Smithkline Dated: September 29, 2010 OBER, KALER, GRIMES & SHRIVER, A.P.C. By /s/ Kelly J. Davidson Kelly J. Davidson Attorneys for Defendants Wyeth, Inc. and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. Dated: September 29, 2010 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP By /s/ Lyndon M. Tretter Lyndon M. Tretter Attorneys for Defendant Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Dated: September 29, 2010 JONES DAY By /s/ Peter N. Larson Peter N. Larson Attorneys for Defendants TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc., n/k/a Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. Dated: September 29, 2010 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWN LLP By /s/ Jeffrey W. Lawrence Jeffrey W. Lawrence Attorneys for Plaintiffs County of Santa Clara and County of Santa Cruz Dated: September 29, 2010 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA By /s/ Greta S. Hansen Greta S. Hansen Acting Lead Deputy County Counsel GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _Sept___ber_30 , 2010. ___ em __ __ _____________________________________ Hon. William H. Alsup United States District Judge -2[STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING DECISION FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT - Case No. C-05-03740-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?