United States of America v. Cohan

Filing 9

ORDER to show cause. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 9/29/05. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2005)

Download PDF
United States of America v. Cohan Doc. 9 Case 3:05-cv-03792-PJH Document 9 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. JOHN C. COHAN, aka Christopher Cohan; MAX D. GRAY, Respondents. / No. C 05-3791 PJH (Related C 05-3792 PJH) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ENFORCEMENT OF IRS SUMMONSES AND VACATING AND RESETTING HEARING DATE RE: COHAN United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It is further ORDERED that: 1. A copy of this order, together with the Petitions to Enforce IRS summonses Upon consideration of the United States' Petitions to Enforce Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") Summonses, Memoranda in support thereof, and Declarations of Revenue Agent Michele Pierano in support thereof, the court finds that the United States has established a prima facie case under United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 58 (1964) for enforcement of the IRS summonses at issue. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondents, John C. Cohan, also known as Christopher Cohan, and Max D. Gray, appear before the undersigned United States District Judge, in Courtroom No. 3, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102, on Wednesday, December 7, 2005 at 9:00 a.m., to show cause why Cohan should not be compelled to obey the four IRS summonses served upon him, and why Gray should not be compelled to obey the two IRS summonses served upon him. and Declarations of Michele Peirano, shall be served in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:05-cv-03792-PJH Document 9 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 upon respondents within 14 days of the date that this order is entered or as soon thereafter as possible. 2. Since the file in this case reflects a prima facie showing that the IRS investigation is being conducted for a legitimate purpose, that the inquiry may be relevant to that purpose, that the information sought is not already within the Commissioner's possession, and that the administrative steps required by the Internal Revenue Code have been followed, see Powell, 379 U.S. at 57-58, the burden of coming forward has shifted to respondents to oppose enforcement of the summonses. 3. If respondents have any defense to present or opposition to the petitions, United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 such defenses or oppositions shall be made in writing, filed with the Clerk, and served on counsel for the United States, at least 21 days prior to the date set for the show-cause hearing. The United States may file a reply to any opposition at least 14 days prior to the date set for the show-cause hearing. 4. At the show-cause hearing, the court will consider all issues raised by respondents. Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by an affidavit or declaration will be considered. Any uncontested allegation in the petition will be considered admitted. 5. Respondents may notify the court, in a writing filed with the Clerk and served on counsel for the United States at least 21 days prior to the date set for the show-cause hearing, that respondents have no objection to enforcement of the summonses. Respondents' appearances at the hearing will then be excused. 6. The December 2, 2005 show-cause hearing date set by Judge Samuel Conti's September 23, 2005 order, with respect to John C. Cohan, also known as 2 Case 3:05-cv-03792-PJH Document 9 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Christopher Cohan, C 05-3792 PJH, prior to this court's relating of the cases, is HEREBY VACATED. Cohan is ORDERED to appear and comply with the requirements of the instant order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 29, 2005 United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?