Curtis v. Shapiro et al

Filing 21

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND PETITION FOR REHEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 22, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court ROBERT CURTIS, v. Plaintiff, No. C-05-3883 MMC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND PETITION FOR REHEARING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE SHAPIRO, et al., Defendants / By order filed December 7, 2009, the Court denied plaintiff's "Petition for Rehearing for Breach of a Federal Contract" ("Petition"), filed November 19, 2009, by which filing plaintiff sought reconsideration of the judgment entered herein on October 26, 2005. Now before the Court is plaintiff's "Petition for Rehearing for Breach of a Federal Contract" ("Second Petition"), filed December 18, 2009, by which filing plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the denial of his previous request for reconsideration of the judgment. Although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow a party to seek relief from a judgment, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), the Federal Rules do not allow a party to seek reconsideration of an order denying a request for reconsideration of a judgment. Moreover, the Second Petition fails to identify any cognizable ground for reconsidering the judgment entered in 2005 or for reconsidering the order filed December 7, 2009. Accordingly, the Second Petition is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 22, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?