K.C., et al v. O'Connell, et al

Filing 79

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice due to settlement; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 3/8/2007. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2007)

Download PDF
K.C., et al v. O'Connell, et al Doc. 79 Case 3:05-cv-04077-MMC Document 79 Filed 03/08/2007 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court K.C., by and through Erica C., her guardian, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JACK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Public Schools for the State of California, et al., Defendants. / The Court having been advised that all parties now have agreed to a settlement of the above-titled action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said action be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 8, 2007 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge No. C-05-4077 MMC ORDER OF DISMISSAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?