Singh v. Still et al

Filing 5

ORDER re: scheduling. Signed by Judge Illston on 10/19/05. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2005)

Download PDF
Singh v. Still et al Doc. 5 Casse3:05-cv-04092-SI Ca e 3:05-cv-04092-SI Document 4-1 Document 5 Filed 10/19/2005 Filed 10/18/2005 Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 Stephen Shaiken, Esq. Bar No. 90915 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN SHAIKEN 170 Columbus Avenue, Suite 100 San Francisco, CA 94133-5102 Telephone: (415) 248-1012 Fax: (415) 248-0019 Attorney for Petitioner Gurdeep Singh 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SAN FRANCISCO 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT: 16 1.) 17 2.) 18 3.) 19 20 Date October 17, 2005 21 22 s/stephen shaiken 23 24 Stephen Shaiken, Counsel for Petitioner 25 SO ORDERED 26 27 28 Edward Olsen, Counsel for Respondents s/edward olsen The parties shall appear before the Court for argument on December 9, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. Petitioner's reply shall be filed and served on or before November 14, 2005; Respondent's answer to the writ shall be file on served on or before November 4, 2005; Gurdeep Singh, ) ) Petitioner, ) vs. ) David Still, District Director, ) United States Citizenship and ) Immigration Services (USCIS), Robert ) Divine, Acting Deputy Director, USCIS , ) and Michael Chertoff, Secretary, ) Department of Homeland Security, ) ) Respondents ) ) District Ct. No.: 05 4092 SI Agency No.: A70 453 299 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SCHEDULING Hon. Susan Ilston, U.S. District CourtD E Judge UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O GRAN T LI FO usan Judge S Illston R NIA NO RT H Dockets.Justia.com Casse3:05-cv-04092-SI Ca e 3:05-cv-04092-SI Document 4-1 Document 5 Filed 10/19/2005 Filed 10/18/2005 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?