Papedo et al v. Cardiology Associates of Marin et al

Filing 8

ORDER OF REFERRAL. Case referred to MHP for the purpose of determining whether it is related to C 04-5061. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/14/05. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2005) Additional attachment(s) added on 10/14/2005 (rbe, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Papedo et al v. Cardiology Associates of Marin et al Doc. 8 Case 3:05-cv-04101-MHP Document 8 Filed 10/14/2005 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GREGORY C. PAPEDO and JANICE A. PAPEDO, Plaintiffs, v. CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF MARIN; GERALD YOUNG, M.D.; MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL; MERCK & CO., INC.; MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC.; and DOES 3 through 200, inclusive, Defendants. / No. C 05-04101 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California ORDER OF REFERRAL 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This action appears to be one of several cases currently pending in the Northern District of California involving the prescription drug VIOXX®. The earliest-filed action was Guinta v. Merck & Co., Inc., Case No. C 04-5061 MHP. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the Court refers this matter to Judge Marilyn H. Patel for the purpose of determining whether it is related as defined in Civil Local Rule 3-12(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 14, 2005 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?