Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time to 12/21/2005 for counterdefendant to file a responsive pleading; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 12/6/2005. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2005)

Download PDF
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al Doc. 19 Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 19 Filed 12/07/2005 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 COOLEY GODWARD LLP STEPHEN C. NEAL (No. 170085) (nealsc@cooley.com) RICARDO RODRIGUEZ (No. 173003) (rr@cooley.com) MICHELLE S. RHYU (No. 212922) (mrhyu@cooley.com) Five Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Tel: (650) 843-5000 Fax: (650) 857-0663 Attorneys for Plaintiff THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY and Counterclaim Defendant, THOMAS MERIGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff, v. ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, ET AL., Defendants. ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, ET AL., Counterclaimants, v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY; AND THOMAS MERIGAN, Counterclaim Defendants. Case No. C 05 04158 MHP STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT MERIGAN TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 27 28 COOLEY GODWARD LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 715640 v2/PA Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 19 Filed 12/07/2005 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY GODWARD LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO WHEREAS, Defendants Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Roche Diagnostics Corporation, and Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. ("Roche") and Plaintiff Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University ("Stanford") agreed and stipulated on November 2, 2005 to extend the time for (1) Roche to respond to Stanford's Complaint from November 3, 2005 until November 17, 2005 and (2) Stanford to respond to Roche's response from December 7, 2005 until December 21, 2005; WHEREAS, Roche asserted counterclaims against Stanford and Thomas Merigan ("Merigan") in its Answer and Counterclaims filed on November 17, 2005; WHEREAS, Merigan was not a part of the previous stipulation to extend time; WHEREAS, Roche, Stanford and Merigan have agreed to extend Merigan's time to respond to Roche's Answer and Counterclaims from December 7, 2005 until December 21, 2005, so that as the deadline for Merigan's response coincides with that for Stanford's response; THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, Roche, Stanford and Merigan, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Merigan's last day on which to respond to Roche's Answer and Complaint is December 21, 2005. EXECUTED this 30th day of November, 2005. STIPULATED AND AGREED: Dated: November 30, 2005 COOLEY GODWARD LLP STEPHEN C. NEAL RICARDO RODRIGUEZ MICHELLE S. RHYU /s/ Michelle Rhyu Attorneys for Plaintiff The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and Counterclaim Defendant Thomas Merigan 715640 v2/PA 2. STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR MERIGAN CASE NO. C 05 04158 JCS Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 19 Filed 12/07/2005 Page 3 of 3 1 Dated: November 30, 2005 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY GODWARD LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP ADRIAN M. PRUETZ JEFFREY N. BOOZELL ROBERT W. STONE /s/ Jeffrey N. Boozell Attorneys for Defendants Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; Roche Diagnostics Corporation; and Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Michelle S. Rhyu hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 12/6/2005 ___________________________________________ United States District Court Judge Marilyn Hall Patel UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R 715640 v2/PA 3. STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR MERIGAN CASE NO. C 05 04158 JCS A C LI FO arily Judge M n H. Pa tel R NIA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?