Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 68

Proposed Order AND STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TIME TO COMPLETE DEPOSITION DISCOVERY by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.. (Stone, Robert) (Filed on 9/15/2006)

Download PDF
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al Doc. 68 Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 68 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 4 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Adrian M. Pruetz (Bar No. 118215) 2 Jeffrey N. Boozell (Bar No. 199507) 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 3 Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 4 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 E-Mail: adrianpruetz@quinnemanuel.com 5 jeffboozell@quinnemanuel.com 6 7 8 9 10 11 Robert W. Stone (Bar No. 163513) Brian C. Cannon (Bar No. 193071) T.J. Chiang (Bar No. 235165) 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 E-Mail: robertstone@quinnemanuel.com briancannon@quinnemanuel.com tjchiang@quinnemanuel.com Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; Roche 12 Diagnostics Corporation; and Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. C-05-04158 MHP 15 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, 16 Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC.; ROCHE 19 DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION; ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC., 20 Defendants. 21 ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC. ROCHE 22 DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION; ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC., 23 Counterclaimants, 24 vs. 25 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND 26 STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY; AND THOMAS MERIGAN. 27 Counterclaim Defendants. 28 04972/1958038.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TIME TO COMPLETE DEPOSITION DISCOVERY Case No. C-05-04158 MHP [PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TIME TO COMPLETE DEPOSITION DISCOVERY Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 68 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 2 of 4 1 WHEREAS, the Court has suggested that the parties stipulate to extend the discovery 2 cutoff and briefing schedule for 30 days beyond the dates set forth in the Stipulation filed on 3 August 24, 2006; and 4 WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend the discovery cutoff as recommended provided 5 that absent agreement of the parties there shall be no further extensions requested or granted; 6 7 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The deadline for completion of deposition discovery shall be extended from 8 September 14, 2006 to October 13, 2006. 9 2. During the extension provided for by this stipulation, the parties may complete 10 deposition discovery that is currently outstanding. Additional depositions shall not be noticed or 11 scheduled as a result of this stipulation absent agreement of the parties or order of the Court. 12 3. No party shall be deemed to have waived, as a result of this stipulation, any of its 13 objections to currently noticed depositions, including objections based on the appropriateness of 14 those depositions or the timeliness of the service of the notices of deposition and/or subpoenas. 15 16 / / / 17 / / / 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 28 04972/1958038.1 Case No. C-05-04158 MHP -1[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TIME TO COMPLETE DEPOSITION DISCOVERY Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 68 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 3 of 4 1 The schedule for submitting briefs and for the hearing on the Motions for Summary Judgment 2 relating to the first phase of this case shall be amended as follows: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Dated: September 15, 2006 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: 27 28 04972/1958038.1 Identification of Topics for Summary Judgment Opening Summary Judgment Briefs Responsive Briefs Hearing October 20, 2006 October 27, 2006 November 15, 2006 December 4, 2006 Dated: September 14, 2006 COOLEY GODWARD LLP STEPHEN C. NEAL RICARDO RODRIGUEZ MICHELLE S. RHYU /S/ Michelle S. Rhyu Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and Counterclaim Defendant Thomas Merigan QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP ADRIAN M. PRUETZ JEFFREY N. BOOZELL ROBERT W. STONE /S/ Robert W. Stone Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiff Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; Roche Diagnostics Corporation; and Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. ORDER HONORABLE MARILYN HALL PATEL United States District Court Judge Case No. C-05-04158 MHP -2[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TIME TO COMPLETE DEPOSITION DISCOVERY Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 68 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 4 of 4 1 Attestation of E-Filed Signature 2 I, Robert W. Stone, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file a Stipulation Re: Extension of Briefing Schedule and Time to Complete Deposition Discovery. In 3 compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michelle Rhyu has concurred in the filing. 4 5 DATED: September 15, 2006 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 04972/1958038.1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP By /S/ Robert W. Stone Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; Roche Diagnostics Corporation; and Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. Case No. C-05-04158 MHP -3[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TIME TO COMPLETE DEPOSITION DISCOVERY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?