Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 9

Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al

Doc. 9

Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP

Document 9

Filed 11/02/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Adrian M. Pruetz (Bar No. 118215) Jeffrey N. Boozell (Bar No. 199507) 2 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 3 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: [phone] [phone] 4 Facsimile: Email: [e-mail] [e-mail] 5 Robert W. Stone (Bar No. 163513) 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 7 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] 9 6 10 Attorneys for Defendants Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; Roche Diagnostics Corporation; and 11 Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. C-05-04158 JCS STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC.; ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION; AND ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC. TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT; AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND ) ) 16 STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ) Plaintiff, ) 17 ) v. ) 18 ) ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC.; ROCHE ) 19 DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION; ROCHE ) DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC.; ROCHE ) 20 DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC. ) ) 21 Defendants. ) ) 22 ) 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Case No. C-05-04158 JCS

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP

Document 9

Filed 11/02/2005

Page 2 of 2

1

WHEREAS, defendants Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; Roche Diagnostics

2 Corporation; and Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. ("Roche") and plaintiff Board of Trustees 3 of The Leland Stanford Junior University ("Stanford") have agreed to extend the time that Roche 4 has to respond to Stanford's Complaint from November 3, 2005 until November 17, 2005; 5 WHEREAS, Roche and Stanford have further agreed to extend the time that Stanford

6 has to respond to Roche's response to Stanford's Complaint; and 7 WHEREAS, Roche has received no other extensions of time to answer or otherwise

8 respond to the Complaint; 9 THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, Roche and Stanford, by and through their

10 respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree, as follows: 11 (1) Roche's last day on which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is

12 November 17, 2005; and 13 (2) Stanford's last day on which to respond to Roche's response to Stanford's

14 Complaint is December 21, 2005. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Case No. C-05-04158 JCS

DATED: November 2, 2005

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP By /s/ Robert W. Stone Attorneys for Defendants

DATED: November 2, 2005

COOLEY GODWARD, LLP By /s/ Michelle Rhyu Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: __________________

___________________________________ United States Magistrate Court Judge

-2-