Johnson v. Galaza

Filing 27

CLERK'S JUDGMENT: The Court concludes that neither the California Court of Appeal nor the Santa Clara County Superior Court rendered a decision that was contrary to, or constituted an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, or entailed an unreasonable determination of facts. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby DENIED. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Deputy Clerk v. GEORGE GALAZA, Warden, Respondent. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERICK GRAHAM JOHNSON, aka ERICK BROWN JOHNSON, Petitioner, No. CV-05-4612 MMC (PR) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE () Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. (X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the Court concludes that neither the California Court of Appeal nor the Santa Clara County Superior Court rendered a decision that was contrary to, or constituted an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, or entailed an unreasonable determination of facts. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby DENIED. Dated: March 31, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Tracy Lucero

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?