Vasquez v. Runnels
ORDER GRANTING 21 MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 27, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) DAVID L. RUNNELS, Warden, ) ) Respondent. _______________________________ ) ANTONIO VASQUEZ, No. C 05-4669 MMC (PR) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE (Docket No. 21)
Petitioner, a California prisoner incarcerated at the California State Prison Solano and proceeding pro se, has filed a request to submit additional briefing in the above-titled habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Specifically, although the petition has been fully briefed, petitioner states that a recent ruling by the state court is pertinent to his jury selection claim. He also seeks leave to move for an evidentiary hearing. Good cause appearing, petitioner's request is hereby GRANTED. Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on respondent's counsel, within thirty days of the date this order is filed, a supplemental brief addressing the claim at issue and his request for an evidentiary hearing. Respondent shall file a response no later than twenty days from the date petitioner's supplemental brief is filed. No hearing will be held unless the Court so orders at a later date. This order terminates Docket No. 21. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 27, 2009 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?