Bartholomew v. General Electric Company et al

Filing 27

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 27, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESQ., CA S.B. #73685
DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., CA S.B. #154436
Email: [e-mail]
BRAYTON˜PURCELL LLP
Attorneys at Law
222 Rush Landing Road
P.O. Box 6169
Novato, California 94948-6169
[phone]
[phone] (Fax No.)

6
7

Attorneys for Plaintiff
admitted Pro Hac Vice

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
222 RUSH LANDING ROAD
P O BOX 6169
NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169
[phone]

BRAYTON˜PURCELL LLP

11
12

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. VI)

13

__________________________________

14

MILTON BARTHOLOMEW,
Plaintiff,

15
16

vs.

17

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
et al.,

18
Defendants
19
20
21
22
23

Case No. 3:05-cv-04947-MMC

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

____________________________________
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
OF ENTIRE ACTION, WITHOUT
PREJUDICE; ORDER

This document relates to:
Milton Bartholomew v. General Electric
Company, et al., United States District
Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania,
Case No. 2:09-cv-62921-ER

24
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
PLAINTIFF ’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER,
Case No. 3:05-cv-04947-MMC

1
2

Plaintiff hereby dismiss the above-captioned action against all Defendants, without
prejudice.

3
4
5
6

Dated: September 26, 2012

BRAYTON˜PURCELL LLP

7
8
9
By: s/ David R. Donadio

10

DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., CA S.B. #154436

Email: [e-mail]
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

11
12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED:

16
17
18
19
20

Dated: ___________________
September 27, 2012
United States District Court Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PLAINTIFF ’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER,
Case No. 3:05-cv-04947-MMC