Pedraza et al v. Alameda Unified School District et al

Filing 154

ORDER re 153 Statement filed by Linda Pedraza. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court States District Court United For the Northern DistrictFof California District of California or the Northern 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On December 12, 2008, plaintiff Linda Pedraza ("Plaintiff") filed a statement requesting that the undersigned recuse himself. Doc #153. Plaintiff previously filed the same LINDA PEDRAZA, individually and on behalf of her son, Michael Pedraza, and FRANCISCO PEDRAZA, individually and on behalf of his son, Michael Pedraza, Plaintiffs, v ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al, Defendants. / No C 05-4977 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

request, Doc #125 at 9, which the court denied because plaintiff had not enumerated any facts suggesting personal bias or prejudice by the undersigned. Doc #150 at 5. Plaintiff still has not Accordingly,

alleged any facts to support a substitution of judge.

plaintiff's request for a substitution of judge, Doc #153, is DENIED.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff also moves for a renotice of all previously terminated "motions, reconsiderations and filings." Doc #153 at 2.

Because plaintiff has not obtained leave from the court to file a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Civ L R 7-9(a), plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is not properly before the court and will not be considered. To the extent it was docketed as a motion,

the clerk is directed to terminate Doc #153.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge

2