Pedraza et al v. Alameda Unified School District et al
Filing
181
ORDER re 167 166 165 163 . Plaintiff has fourteen days to respond to defendants' motions. The hearing scheduled for 3/19/2009 is vacated. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 pleadings. On January 28, 2009, defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's complaint or alternatively for judgment on the Docs ##163, 165-167. Plaintiff did not respond to Doc LINDA PEDRAZA, Plaintiff, v ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al, Defendants. / No C 05-4977 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court For the Northern District of California
these motions, as she had already filed a notice of appeal. #156.
On March 3, 2009, the court of appeals found that it lacked Doc #180.
jurisdiction over plaintiff's interlocutory appeal.
Accordingly, plaintiff must now submit her response to defendants' motions.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiff is ORDERED to respond to defendants' motions, Docs ##163, 165-167, within fourteen days from the date of this order. VACATED. The hearing currently scheduled for March 19, 2009 is The court will reschedule the hearing as necessary once
plaintiff submits her response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
