Pedraza et al v. Alameda Unified School District et al

Filing 232

ORDER directing defendants to file a reply of not more than ten pages on or before November 19, 2010. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2010)

Pedraza et al v. Alameda Unified School District et al

Doc. 232

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The court has received plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motions for judgment on the pleadings, Doc #222, and for summary judgment, Doc #223. Doc #225. Plaintiff filed her LINDA PEDRAZA, individually and on behalf of her son, Michael Pedraza, and FRANCISCO PEDRAZA, individually and on behalf of his son, Michael Pedraza, Plaintiffs, v ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al, Defendants. / No C 05-4977 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

opposition after the deadline for doing so had passed; nevertheless, the court will consider the merits of her opposition. If defendants wish, they may each file an opposition of not more than ten pages on or before November 19, 2010. At that time, the

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

motions will be deemed submitted and no further briefing will be considered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge

2