Schoenfeld v. Marshall

Filing 8

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/16/2005. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2005)

Download PDF
Schoenfeld v. Marshall Doc. 8 Case 3:05-cv-05145-MMC Document 8 Filed 12/16/2005 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RICHARD SCHOENFELD, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent. / Before the Court is the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed December 13 2005 by petitioner Richard Schoenfeld pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner concedes the lawfulness of his conviction and sentence, (see Petition at 13), and challenges only respondent's repeated denial of parole. Pursuant to Habeas Local Rule 2254-3, where a petitioner does not challenge the lawfulness of his conviction or sentence, but challenges only the manner in which the sentence is being executed, the action "shall be transferred" to "the district of confinement." See Habeas L.R. 2254-3. Petitioner alleges that he is currently confined in the County of San Luis Obispo. (See Petition at 2.) The County of San Luis Obispo is located in the Central District of California, Western Division. See 28 U.S.C. 84(c). Accordingly, the instant action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 16, 2005 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge No. C-05-5145 MMC ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?