Nash v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District

Filing 66

ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE. The court ORDERS the parties to appear for a telephonic status conference at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, October 4, 2012 to discuss when the court can expect the parties to file a stipulation of dismissa l pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. The parties are directed to contact CourtCall (866-582-6878) to arrange for their telephonic appearances at the hearing. Telephone Conference set for 10/4/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler.. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/2/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 San Francisco Division PATRICIA NASH, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 No. C 05-05307 LB Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE v. 13 BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, Re: ECF No. 65] 14 15 Defendant. _____________________________________/ 16 On October 1, 2012, the parties filed a Joint Status Report that informed the court that they 17 “submit that [Defendant Bay Area Rapid Transit District] has fully complied with the terms of the 18 [settlement] agreement.” Joint Status Report, ECF No. 65 at 2. Accordingly, the court ORDERS 19 the parties to appear for a telephonic status conference at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, October 4, 2012 to 20 discuss when the court can expect the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal 21 Rule of Civil Procedure 41. The parties are directed to contact CourtCall (866-582-6878) to arrange 22 for their telephonic appearances at the hearing. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 2, 2012 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 C 05-05307 LB ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?