Nash v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Filing
66
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE. The court ORDERS the parties to appear for a telephonic status conference at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, October 4, 2012 to discuss when the court can expect the parties to file a stipulation of dismissa l pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. The parties are directed to contact CourtCall (866-582-6878) to arrange for their telephonic appearances at the hearing. Telephone Conference set for 10/4/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler.. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/2/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
Northern District of California
10
San Francisco Division
PATRICIA NASH,
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
No. C 05-05307 LB
Plaintiff,
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC
STATUS CONFERENCE
v.
13
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT,
Re: ECF No. 65]
14
15
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
16
On October 1, 2012, the parties filed a Joint Status Report that informed the court that they
17
“submit that [Defendant Bay Area Rapid Transit District] has fully complied with the terms of the
18
[settlement] agreement.” Joint Status Report, ECF No. 65 at 2. Accordingly, the court ORDERS
19
the parties to appear for a telephonic status conference at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, October 4, 2012 to
20
discuss when the court can expect the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal
21
Rule of Civil Procedure 41. The parties are directed to contact CourtCall (866-582-6878) to arrange
22
for their telephonic appearances at the hearing.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 2, 2012
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
25
26
27
28
C 05-05307 LB
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?