Apple Computer Inc. v. Burst.com, Inc.

Filing 102

Minute Entry: Claims Construction Hearing held on 2/8/2007 before Judge Marilyn Hall Patel. Defendant may respond to the document submitted to the Court during Mr. Stephens' presentation. Defendant is to respond to plaintiff's summary judgment motions within 30 days of the date of the filing of the Court's Order re: Claim Construction. Plaintiff is to reply within 2 weeks thereafter. The matter will be set for a hearing at 2:00 p.m on a date other than the court's standard Monday civil Law and Motions calendar. (Court Reporter Jim Yeomans.) (epb, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 2/9/2007)

Apple Computer Inc. v. Burst.com, Inc.

Doc. 102

Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP

Document 102

Filed 02/09/2007

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL PRETRIAL MINUTES Date: February 8, 2007 Case No. C 06-0019 MHP Judge: MARILYN H. PATEL

Title: APPLE COMPUTER -v- BURST.COM INC Attorneys: Plf: Matthew Powers, Nicholas A. Brown, Garland Stephens Dft: Parker Folse, Leslie Payne, Ian Crosby, Floyd Short, Randall Gard, Michael Heim, Robert Yorio Deputy Clerk: Edward Butler Court Reporter: Jim Yeomans Time in Court: 9:16 a.m. - 1:15 p.m.; 2:17 p.m. - 4:47 p.m.

PROCEEDINGS 1) Claim Construction Hearing 2) 3)

SUMMARY: Oral arguments re: claim construction. Defendant may respond to the document submitted to the Court during Mr. Stephens' presentation. The Court orders defendant to respond to plaintiff's summary judgment motions within 30 days of the date of the filing of the Court's Order re: Claim Construction. Plaintiff is to reply within 2 weeks thereafter. The matter will be set for a hearing at 2:00 p.m on a date other than the court's standard Monday Law and Motions calendar.

Dockets.Justia.com