Apple Computer Inc. v. Burst.com, Inc.

Filing 113

MOTION to Increase Page Limit of its Reply Brief For its Motion For Summary Judgment of Invalidity filed by Apple Inc.. (Brown, Nicholas) (Filed on 6/20/2007) Modified on 6/22/2007 (gba, COURT STAFF).

Apple Computer Inc. v. Burst.com, Inc.

Doc. 113

Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP

Document 113

Filed 06/20/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795) [e-mail] GARLAND T. STEPHENS (admitted N.D.C.A., Texas Bar No. 24053910) [e-mail] NICHOLAS A. BROWN (Bar No. 198210) [e-mail] WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Silicon Valley Office 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE COMPUTER, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPLE COMPUTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. BURST.COM, INC., Defendant.

Case No. C 06-0019 MHP APPLE'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO INCREASE THE PAGE LIMIT OF ITS REPLY BRIEF FOR ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel Complaint Filed: January 4, 2006 Trial Date: February 26, 2008

APPLE'S MISC. ADMIN. REQUEST TO INCREASE PAGE LIMIT OF ITS REPLY BRIEF

Case No. C 06-0019 MHP

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP

Document 113

Filed 06/20/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-11 and 7-12, Apple hereby moves to increase the page limit for its reply brief in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity from 15 pages to 18 pages. Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 7-3(c) states that reply briefs or memoranda may not exceed fifteen pages of text. Apple requests this Court increase the page limit by three pages, from 15 pages to 18 pages. Burst.com, Inc. does not oppose this request. A stipulation to that effect is attached hereto. The increase in the page limit is warranted because Burst does not oppose the request, because the requested increase is small (3 pages), because the Court issued its claim construction order after Apple filed its motion, and because the motion addresses two prior art references and 11 claims. Dated: June 20, 2007 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP By: __/s/ Nicholas A. Brown_____ Nicholas A. Brown Attorney for Plaintiff Apple Computer, Inc.

APPLE'S MISC. ADMIN. REQUEST TO INCREASE PAGE LIMIT OF ITS REPLY BRIEF

Case No. C 06-0019 MHP

1