Pickard v. Department of Justice
Filing
132
ORDER REQUESTING SEPARATE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/3/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
WILLIAM LEONARD PICKARD,
10
Plaintiff(s),
11
vs.
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE,
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 06-0185 CRB (PR)
ORDER REQUESTING
SEPARATE CASE
MANAGEMENT
STATEMENTS
15
16
Plaintiff, a federal prisoner currently incarcerated at the United States
17
Penitentiary in Tucson, Arizona, seeks enforcement of his Freedom of
18
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 522 ("FOIA"), request to the Drug Enforcement
19
Administration ("DEA") for records pertaining to confidential informant Gordon
20
Todd Skinner. In response to plaintiff's request, the DEA submitted a Glomar
21
response refusing to confirm or deny the existence of any responsive records
22
pertaining to Skinner, citing exceptions 6 and 7(C), (D) and (F) of FOIA. After
23
the Office of Information and Privacy ("OIP") upheld the DEA's response, the
24
instant FOIA court action followed.
25
After this court granted summary judgment in favor of the government,
26
holding that Skinner's identity as a confidential informant had not been "officially
27
confirmed" within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. § 552(c)(2), and that a Glomar
28
response was appropriate under exemptions 7(C) an7(D), plaintiff appealed.
1
Per order filed on July 27, 2011, the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded.
2
The court held that "because the government officially confirmed Skinner's status
3
as an informant in open court in the course of official proceedings, the
4
government cannot continue to 'neither admit nor deny' Skinner's informant status
5
in response to a FOIA request." Pickard v. Dep't of Justice, No. 08-15504, slip
6
op. 9625, 9628 (9th Cir. July 27, 2011). But the court made clear that this is not
7
to say that all documents related to Skinner are subject to disclosure: "We simply
8
hold that since Skinner has already been officially identified as an informant by
9
government counsel and agents, the cat is out of the bag and the government must
10
proceed to the next step – provide an index of the documents it has and make
11
whatever additional objections to disclosure it deems appropriate." Id. at 9628-
12
29. The court's mandate issued on September 19, 2011.
13
In order to expedite these proceedings, the court orders that, by no later
14
than December 16, 2011, the parties shall file separate case management
15
statements addressing all of the topics set forth in the Standing Order for All
16
Judges of the Northern District of California – Contents of Joint Case
17
Management Statements, which can be found on the court's website located at
18
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. The clerk shall also mail a copy of the standing
19
order to plaintiff, who is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel.
20
SO ORDERED.
21
DATED: Nov. 3, 2011
22
CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
G:\PRO-SE\CRB\OTHER.06\Pickard, W.06-0185.or6.wpd
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?