Pickard v. Department of Justice
Filing
183
ORDER granting 182 STIPULATION on Summary Judgment Briefing filed by William Leonard Pickard. Motions due by 1/7/2014. Responses due by 1/21/2014; Cross Motions due by 1/21/2014. Opposition/Replies due by 2/11/2014. Motion Hearing set for 3/28/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/31/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2013)
1
2
3
4
MARK RUMOLD (SBN 279060)
1333 Gough St., Apt 12G
San Francisco, CA 94109
(415) 694-1639
mark.rumold@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
William Pickard
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
WILLIAM LEONARD PICKARD,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:06-cv-00185-CRB
STIPULATION REGARDING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING
AND ORDER
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Ctrm. 6, 17th Floor
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BRIEFING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
No. 3:06-cv-00185-CRB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Subject to the approval of the Court, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request
entry of an order lifting the stay in this case (see ECF No. 181) and establishing the following
summary judgment briefing schedule:
(1) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment – January 7, 2014 (1 brief, 15-page limit);
(2) Plaintiff’s Opposition and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment – January 21, 2014
(1 brief, 15-page limit);
(3) Defendant’s Opposition and Reply – February 11, 2014 (1 brief, 15-page limit);
(4) Plaintiff’s Reply – February 25, 2014 (1 brief, 10-page limit).
Hearing – March 28, 2014, 10:00 a.m.
In light of the previous round of summary judgment briefing (see ECF Nos. 140, 152, 161,
162), the parties anticipate incorporating by reference arguments made in those briefs into the
forthcoming motions for summary judgment.
13
Respectfully submitted,
14
15
Dated: November 1, 2013
By:
_/s/ Mark Rumold___
MARK RUMOLD
Attorney for Plaintiff
16
17
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
18
19
Dated: November 1, 2013
By:
/s/ Neill Tseng (by permission)
NEILL T. TSENG
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BRIEFING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
No. 3:06-cv-00185-CRB
*
1
*
*
*
*
2
DECLARATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5.1
3
I, Mark Rumold, hereby declare pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 that I have obtained
4
Defendants’ concurrence in the filing of this document from Neill T. Tseng, Counsel for
5
Defendant.
6
Executed on November 1, 2013, in San Francisco, California.
7
8
/s/ Mark Rumold
Mark Rumold
9
10
*
11
*
*
*
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
J
ER
H
19
20
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FO
RT
18
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
NO
17
R NIA
_________________________________
HONORABLE CHARLESORBREYER
R. DERED
SO DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES IS
IT SENIOR
LI
16
DATED: October 31, 2013
UNIT
ED
15
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
14
S
13
A
12
*
2
STIPULATION REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BRIEFING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
No. 3:06-cv-00185-CRB
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?