Pickard v. Department of Justice

Filing 183

ORDER granting 182 STIPULATION on Summary Judgment Briefing filed by William Leonard Pickard. Motions due by 1/7/2014. Responses due by 1/21/2014; Cross Motions due by 1/21/2014. Opposition/Replies due by 2/11/2014. Motion Hearing set for 3/28/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/31/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MARK RUMOLD (SBN 279060) 1333 Gough St., Apt 12G San Francisco, CA 94109 (415) 694-1639 mark.rumold@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff William Pickard 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 WILLIAM LEONARD PICKARD, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:06-cv-00185-CRB STIPULATION REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND ORDER Hon. Charles R. Breyer Ctrm. 6, 17th Floor 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER No. 3:06-cv-00185-CRB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Subject to the approval of the Court, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request entry of an order lifting the stay in this case (see ECF No. 181) and establishing the following summary judgment briefing schedule: (1) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment – January 7, 2014 (1 brief, 15-page limit); (2) Plaintiff’s Opposition and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment – January 21, 2014 (1 brief, 15-page limit); (3) Defendant’s Opposition and Reply – February 11, 2014 (1 brief, 15-page limit); (4) Plaintiff’s Reply – February 25, 2014 (1 brief, 10-page limit). Hearing – March 28, 2014, 10:00 a.m. In light of the previous round of summary judgment briefing (see ECF Nos. 140, 152, 161, 162), the parties anticipate incorporating by reference arguments made in those briefs into the forthcoming motions for summary judgment. 13 Respectfully submitted, 14 15 Dated: November 1, 2013 By: _/s/ Mark Rumold___ MARK RUMOLD Attorney for Plaintiff 16 17 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 18 19 Dated: November 1, 2013 By: /s/ Neill Tseng (by permission) NEILL T. TSENG Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER No. 3:06-cv-00185-CRB * 1 * * * * 2 DECLARATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5.1 3 I, Mark Rumold, hereby declare pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 that I have obtained 4 Defendants’ concurrence in the filing of this document from Neill T. Tseng, Counsel for 5 Defendant. 6 Executed on November 1, 2013, in San Francisco, California. 7 8 /s/ Mark Rumold Mark Rumold 9 10 * 11 * * * ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. J ER H 19 20 N F D IS T IC T O R 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FO RT 18 . Breyer arles R udge Ch NO 17 R NIA _________________________________ HONORABLE CHARLESORBREYER R. DERED SO DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES IS IT SENIOR LI 16 DATED: October 31, 2013 UNIT ED 15 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 14 S 13 A 12 * 2 STIPULATION REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER No. 3:06-cv-00185-CRB C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?