Jensen Enterprises, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc. et al

Filing 485

CORRECTED SCHEDULING ORDER (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 477 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 William A. Markham, State Bar No. 132970 Dolores A. Contreras, State Bar No. 257230 MALDONADO & MARKHAM, LLP 402 West Broadway, 24th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: Fax: E-mail: (619) 221-4400 (619) 224-3974 wm@maldonadomarkham.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION JENSEN ENTERPRISES, INC., 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 Vs. 14 15 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [P R O P O S ED ] O R D ER C O N TIN U IN G THE TR IA L D A TE A N D PR E-TR IA L C O N F ER EN C E OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC.; PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY; AT&T SERVICES, INC.; and NEVADA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 06-0247 SI (JCS) [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE TRIAL DATE AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE Courtroom 10, 19th Floor The Hon. Susan Illston C om p la in t F iled : J a nu a ry 1 2, 2 0 0 6 Tria l D a te: M a rch 16 , 2 0 0 9 Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 477 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having reviewed the parties' stipulated request for a continuance of the trial date and pre-trial conference if the pending motions in this case are not decided by December 31, 2008, and finding good cause therefor, the Court now issues the following ORDER: 1. 2. The trial date shall be continued from March 16, 2009 to May 11, 2009 @ 8:30 a.m. . The pre-trial conference shall be continued from March 3, 2009 to April 28, 20.09, at 3:30 p m. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: . The Hon. Susan Illston, United States District Judge [P R O P O S ED ] O R D ER C O N TIN U IN G THE TR IA L D A TE A N D PR E-TR IA L C O N F ER EN C E -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?