Jensen Enterprises, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc. et al

Filing 528

ORDER RE: SUPERSEDEAS BOND (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2009)

Case3:06-cv-00247-SI Document526

Filed08/21/09 Page1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

William A. Markham, State Bar No. 132970 MALDONADO & MARKHAM, LLP 402 West Broadway, Suite 2050 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: Fax: E-mail: [phone] [phone] [e-mail]

Dan C. Bowen, Admitted Pro Hac Vice BOWEN, HALL, OHLSON & OSBORNE 555 S. Center Street Reno, NV 89501 Tel: Fax: E-mail: [phone] [phone] [e-mail] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION JENSEN ENTERPRISES, INC., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 06-0247 SI (JCS) PROPOSED ORDER (RE: SUPERSEDEAS BOND AND STAY OF ENFORCEMENT) The Hon. Susan Illston
C om p la in t Filed : J u d g em en t E n tered : R u le 5 9 (e) M otion D en ied : J a n u a ry 1 2 , 2 0 0 6 M a r ch 2 , 2 0 0 9 A p ril 2 0 , 2 0 0 9

15 Plaintiff, 16 17 Vs. 18 19 20 21 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC.; PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY; AT&T SERVICES, INC.; and NEVADA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,

P R O P O S ED O R D ER (R E: S U P ER S ED EA S BO N D A N D S TA Y O F EN FO R C EM EN T)

Case3:06-cv-00247-SI Document526

Filed08/21/09 Page2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 proper.

WHEREAS, the parties to this case are as follows: Plaintiff is Jensen Enterprises, Inc. ("Jensen"), and Defendants are Oldcastle Precast, Inc. ("Oldcastle") as well as Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, and AT&T Services, Inc. (collectively, "AT&T"); and WHEREAS, this Court entered judgment against Jensen on March 2, 2009 and denied Jensen's motion to alter this judgment on April 20, 2009. Jensen gave notice that it would appeal from this judgment on April 28, 2009, and this appeal remains pending in the Court of Appeal for the 9th Circuit; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2009, this Court taxed costs of suit in favor of Oldcastle and AT&T, awarding $58,788.41 in costs to Oldcastle (Docket No. 523) and $48,976.94 to AT&T (Docket No. 524). The sum of these two awards is $107,765.35; and WHEREAS, Defendants have requested that Jensen provide a supersedeas bond to secure these awarded costs during the pendency of its appeal, and Jensen has agreed to do so, and the parties have agreed that the proper amount of this bond is 125% of the sum of the two awards, which is $134,706.69; and WHEREAS, the parties have stipulated to the following terms and conditions concerning the posting Jensen's supersedeas bond and a stay of enforcement proceedings against Jensen; and WHEREAS, this Court finds that these stipulated terms and conditions are reasonable and

WHEREFORE, this Court now issues the following ORDER: 1. Jensen shall forthwith post a supersedeas bond in the manner required by Local Rule

65.1-1 (b) and otherwise in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 62 and Fed. R. App. P. 7 and 8(b). 2. 3. The amount of this supersedeas bond shall be $134,706.69. So long as this bond remains posted in this Court, neither Oldcastle nor AT&T may

take any measure to enforce their respective awards of costs against Jensen, but instead the enforcement of these two awards (Docket Nos. 523 and 524) shall be stayed in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 62 (d). // //
P R O P O S ED O R D ER (R E: S U P ER S ED EA S BO N D A N D S TA Y O F EN FO R C EM EN T)

-2-

Case3:06-cv-00247-SI Document526

Filed08/21/09 Page3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

IT IS SO ORDERED. 8/21/09 The Hon. Susan Illston, United States District Judge

DATED:

A PPR O V ED A S T O FO R M :

D A T E D : A u gu s t 1 4 , 2 0 0 9

R e s p e c tfu lly s u b m itte d , F O LG E R , LE V IN & K A H N , LLP

10 11 12 13 14 15 AT&T SERVICES, INC. LEGAL DEPARTMENT 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 M A LD O N A D O & M AR K H AM , LLP 23 /s / 24 25 26 27 28
P R O P O S ED O R D ER (R E: S U P ER S ED EA S BO N D A N D S TA Y O F EN FO R C EM EN T)

B y: J a n in e S c a n c a r e lli, A tto rn e y s fo r D e fe n d a n t O LD C A ST LE P R E C A ST , IN C . D A T E D : A u gu s t 1 4 , 2 0 0 9 R e s p e c tfu lly s u b m itte d ,

B y: R a y m o n d P . B o la ñ o s , A tto rn e y s fo r D e fe n d a n ts P A C IF IC B E LL T E LE P H O N E C O M P A N Y , N E V A D A B E LL T E LE P H O N E C O M P A N Y , A N D SB C SE R V IC E S, IN C . D A T E D : A u gu s t 1 4 , 2 0 0 9 R e s p e c tfu lly s u b m itte d ,

B y: W illia m A . M a r kh a m , A t t o r n e y s fo r P la in ti f f , J E N SE N E N T E R P R IS E S, IN C .

-3-

Case3:06-cv-00247-SI Document526

Filed08/21/09 Page4 of 5

Case3:06-cv-00247-SI Document526

Filed08/21/09 Page5 of 5