Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland et al

Filing 260

ORDER DENYING 259 SAN FRANCISCO DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO MODIFY THE COURT'S ORDER OF NOVEMBER 18, 2009 [re 258 Order]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 11/18/2009. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2009) Modified on 11/19/2009 (sis, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. / ORDER DENYING SAN FRANCISCO DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO MODIFY THE COURT'S ORDER OF NOVEMBER 18, 2009 RAHINAH IBRAHIM, Plaintiff, No. C 06-00545 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On November 16, 2009, former federal defendants, including the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and Transportation Security Administration, filed an administrative motion to file under seal and in camera attachment A to former federal defendants' opposition to San Francisco defendants' motion to authorize disclosure (Dkt. No. 250). An order dated November 17, 2009, partially granted former federal defendants administrative motion (Dkt. No. 255). Per a request by the former federal defendants, an order dated November 18, 2009, then clarified the November 17 order. San Francisco defendants now request a modification to the November 18 order. Counsel have transformed this proceeding into a mess. The Court has tried to sort it out with its order earlier today. It may not be perfect, but it is the best that can be done under the circumstances and will not be further modified. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 18, 2009. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?