Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland et al
Filing
559
ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES by Judge Alsup deferring ruling on 553 Motion to Continue; granting in part and denying in part 554 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
RAHINAH IBRAHIM,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. C 06-00545 WHA
v.
ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE
ISSUES
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY, et al.,
Defendants.
/
17
18
Plaintiff’s motion to remove incorrectly-filed documents (Dkt. No. 554) is GRANTED to
19
the following extent: the CLERK SHALL SEAL Exhibits A (Dkt. #542-1) and JJ (Dkt. #543-10) to
20
the Declaration of Christine Peek in Opposition to Federal Defendants’ Motion for Summary
21
Judgment. Plaintiff shall file appropriately-redacted versions of the same documents on the
22
public docket by OCTOBER 3 AT NOON.
23
Plaintiff shall file a response to the government’s September 27 letter brief (Dkt. No.
24
552) not to exceed three pages by OCTOBER 2 AT 5:00 P.M. The expert discovery issue will be
25
heard on OCTOBER 10 AT 8:00 A.M.
26
27
28
The government’s motion to continue deadlines in light of the lapse in appropriations
1
(Dkt. No. 553) will be HELD IN ABEYANCE until the Court can assess the extent of any
2
prejudice to orderly progress of this action.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: October 1, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?