Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland et al
Filing
657
REQUEST FOR SUBMISSIONS RE SSI VERSUS SECRET STANDARDS. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 7, 2013. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
RAHINAH IBRAHIM,
10
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
12
13
14
No. C 06-00545 WHA
v.
REQUEST FOR SUBMISSIONS
RE SSI VERSUS SECRET
STANDARDS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY, et al.,
Defendants.
/
15
16
With respect to the government’s contention that it cannot defend itself without revealing
17
information it has stamped classified, please address the legal issue of the difference in standards
18
for SSI versus secret. Put differently, given that SSI already has a level of protection from
19
disclosure, what more is required to qualify for state secrets treatment than is already required
20
for SSI? If the government’s interest could be adequately protected via SSI treatment, which can
21
be disclosed for litigation without public access, why should the government be allowed to
22
classify evidence as state secrets and thereby deny the opponent an opportunity to meet the
23
evidence? Did the court of appeals consider this distinction in Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan,
24
Inc., 614 F.3d 1070, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc)?
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: December 7, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?