Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland et al

Filing 657

REQUEST FOR SUBMISSIONS RE SSI VERSUS SECRET STANDARDS. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 7, 2013. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RAHINAH IBRAHIM, 10 Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 12 13 14 No. C 06-00545 WHA v. REQUEST FOR SUBMISSIONS RE SSI VERSUS SECRET STANDARDS DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. / 15 16 With respect to the government’s contention that it cannot defend itself without revealing 17 information it has stamped classified, please address the legal issue of the difference in standards 18 for SSI versus secret. Put differently, given that SSI already has a level of protection from 19 disclosure, what more is required to qualify for state secrets treatment than is already required 20 for SSI? If the government’s interest could be adequately protected via SSI treatment, which can 21 be disclosed for litigation without public access, why should the government be allowed to 22 classify evidence as state secrets and thereby deny the opponent an opportunity to meet the 23 evidence? Did the court of appeals consider this distinction in Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, 24 Inc., 614 F.3d 1070, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc)? 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: December 7, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?