Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland et al

Filing 685

ORDER RE FILING PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 15, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
RAHINAH IBRAHIM,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

No. C 06-00545 WHA

v.

ORDER RE FILING PROPOSED
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY, et al.,
Defendants.
/

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

In December 2013, the parties submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of
law without proposed redactions. A December 2013 order stated:
Any proposal or response that relies on SSI or any evidence for
which privilege was actually sustained on the record as to that
evidence must be redacted in the public record but a full and
unredacted version must be filed under seal.
(Dkt. No. 652). A January 2010 protective order regarding sensitive security information stated:
Any Party who wishes to use a Restricted Use Document or the
Sensitive Security Information contained therein in connection
with a motion or other submission to this Court must file the
Restricted Use Document and any pleadings, motions or other
papers containing Sensitive Security Information under seal.
Where possible, only the portions of the filings that contain
Sensitive Security Information shall be filed under seal.

26

(Dkt. No. 312). The parties have yet to file public versions of their proposed findings and

27

responses. Accordingly, the parties shall file (1) public versions of their December 13 proposed

28

findings of fact and conclusions of law with redactions, if any; (2) public versions of their
December 20 responses with redactions, if any; and (3) full and unredacted versions of their

1

proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and responses under seal by NOON ON

2

JANUARY 24.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: January 15, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2