Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland et al

Filing 715

ORDER STRIKING REPLY DECLARATION AND EXHIBITS re 712 Declaration in Support, filed by Rahinah Ibrahim, 714 Objection,, filed by Tom Ridge, National Counterterrorism Center, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Department of State, Arthur M. Cumming s, II, Janet Napolitano, Hilary Clinton, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Michael E. Leiter, Michael Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security, Terrorist Screening Center, Leonard C. Boyle, Robert Mueller, Donna A. Bucella. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 26, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RAHINAH IBRAHIM, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. C 06-00545 WHA v. ORDER STRIKING REPLY DECLARATION AND EXHIBITS DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. 15 / 16 17 A January 2008 order stated “[r]eply declarations are disfavored. Opening declarations 18 should set forth all facts on points foreseeably relevant to the relief sought” (Dkt. No. 140). On 19 February 18, plaintiff submitted a reply declaration in support of her motion for award of 20 attorney’s fees and costs, appending 228-pages of exhibits (Dkt. No. 712). The exhibits are 21 spreadsheets allegedly supporting her requests for costs and expenses. These could have and 22 should have been filed with her original motion. Defendants have filed an objection seeking to 23 strike the reply declaration and exhibits, or alternatively, requesting leave to file their five-page 24 sur-reply. 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff’s reply declaration and exhibits are hereby STRICKEN. Plaintiff may not rely on docket number 712 and the attached exhibits. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 26, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?