Frederick et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P. et al

Filing 11

ORDER SHORTENING TIME re 10 Stipulation filed by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P.,, Astrazeneca, L.P.,. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 26, 2006. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2006)

Frederick et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P. et al

Doc. 11

Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA

Document 11 Document 10

Filed 07/26/2006 Filed 07/21/2006

Page 1 of 6 Page 1 of 6

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA

Document 11 Document 10

Filed 07/26/2006 Filed 07/21/2006

Page 2 of 6 Page 2 of 6

Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA

Document 11 Document 10

Filed 07/26/2006 Filed 07/21/2006

Page 3 of 6 Page 3 of 6

Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA

Document 11 Document 10

Filed 07/26/2006 Filed 07/21/2006

Page 4 of 6 Page 4 of 6

Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA

Document 11 Document 10

Filed 07/26/2006 Page 5 of 6 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 5 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION JAMES FREDERICK; 06-CV-0590-WA ) ) SAMANTHA GANGIDINE; 06-CV-0643-WA ) ) NED GODFREY; 06-CV-0565-WA ) ) LORI ROBINSON; 06-CV-0663-WA ) ) SHARIE WALKER; 06-CV-0587-WA ) ) LUCAS WEBB; 06-0598-WA ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P., ) ) et al., ) ) Defendants. Assigned to: Hon. William Alsup [Proposed] ORDER SHORTENING TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(b) AND 6-2

[PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME

Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA

Document 11 Document 10

Filed 07/26/2006 Page 6 of 6 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 6 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b) and 6-2, plaintiffs James Frederick, Samantha Gangidine, Ned Godfrey, Lori Robinson, Sharie Walker, and Lucas Webb, by and through their counsel, and defendants AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca LP, by and through their counsel, stipulated to a shortened notice period and briefing schedule on defendants' Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal ("Motion to Vacate"). Specifically, the parties stipulated to the following deadlines and hearing date. Friday, July 21, 2006: Wednesday, August 2, 2006 Electronic filing and service of the Motion to Vacate on all parties by 11:59 p.m. Electronic filing and service of the Opposition to the Motion to Vacate on all parties by 11:59 p.m. Electronic filing and service of the Reply in support of Motion to Vacate on all parties by 11:59 p.m. Hearing on the Motion to Vacate at 8:00 a.m.

Friday, August 11, 2006:

Thursday, August 17, 2006:

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT ED

S

ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

RT U O

ER

N

By:

F D IS T IC T O R

United States District Court Judge

2
[PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME

A

C

LI

FO

Judge W

illiam A

lsup

R NIA

July 26, 2006 Dated: ____________________

VED APPRO

NO

RT
H