Hepting et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 225

Declaration of Kevin S. Bankston in Support of 223 Opposition filed byGregory Hicks, Erik Knutzen, Tash Hepting, Benson B. Roe, Carolyn Jewel. FILED UNDER SEAL (Related document(s) 223 ) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2006)

1 C . AndrewWaters (CA BarNo. 147259) W A T E R S & KRAUS,L.L.P. L ContinentaGrandPlaza l I 3 0 0NorthContinental Blvd..Suite500 El Segundo, Califomia90245 A T e l : ( 3 1 04 1 4 - 8 1 4 6 ) F a x :[phone] 5 (CA Bar No. 134631) LaurelL. Simes 6 LEVIN SIMES KAISER & GORNICK, LLP l4th 7 O n eBushStreet, Floor S a nFrancisco, California 94104 T e l :[phone] 8 F a x :[phone] 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, AlexanderRedfoot, 1 0 a Minor, by and throughhis Guardian a d Litem Michell Redfoot;Michell Redfoot ll
.l

12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
IJ

l4 15

N O R T H E R NDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEXANDER REDFOOT,a Minor, by and throughhis Guardian Litem,MICHELL ad MICHELL REDFOOT, t 7 REDFOOT;
lo

No, PJH C a s e C05-02045 [PROPOSED]ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIF'F''S RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES, A N S W E R STO INTERROGATORIES FOR TO A N D RESPONSES REQUESTS P R O D U C T I O NOF DOCUMENTS,AND F O R REASONABLEATTORNEYSFEES A N D COSTS D a t e : January3,2006 T i m e : 9:00a.m. C t . Room: 3 Filed:April 1,2005 Complaint T r i a l Date:August 13,2007

l8 t 9 vs.

Plaintiffs,

20 B . F .ASCHER& COMPANY,INC.;and DOES inclusive, 2 1 1 through10,, 22
z)

Defendants.

24 25
zb

Themotionof Plaintiff Alexander Redfootfor an Ordercompelling KOLMAR saidDefendant

2 7 LABORATORIES, INC. to (1) providePlaintiff with its Rule26 initial disclosures, which weredue 2 8 on July 21,2006;(2) answer on Plaintiffs First Setof Rule 33 Interrogatories, served August17,
O R D E RGRANTINGPLAINTIFFF'SMOTION TO COMPELDISCOVERYRESPONSES FR O MDEFENDANTKOLMAR LABORATOzuES, INC. AND FORMONETARY SANCTIONS C A S ENO. CO5-02045 PJH

I

for 2006;(3) produce documents the requested Plaintiffs First SetofRule 34 Requests Production in

2 of Documents, served August17,2006;(3) meetandconferin goodfaith with respect to also on
J

for and Kolmar'spersons(s) mostknowledgeable deposition; (a) cooperate settinga dateto produce

4 with Plaintiff s discovery 3 in in requests the futurecameon for hearing Department of the above5 referenced filed andthe all Courl,on January 3,2006,at 9:00a.m. Havingconsidered of the papers 6 oral arguments presented counsel, by 7 I 9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED; Plaintiff s Motion to Compelis granted. with its initial to all DefendanKOLMAR LABORATORIES, t INC. is directed serve parties

1 0 disclosuresDursuant FRCivP 26 no later than to ll its to w DefendanKOLMAR LABORATORIES, t INC. is furtherdirected serve, ithout objections,

t 2 responseto Plaintiff s First Setof Intenogatories n dFirstSetofRequests r Production fo of s a
1a IJ

Documents laterthan no IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: DefendanKOLMAR LABORATORIES. t INC. shall pay the amount of $ to Plaintiff no laterthan
attorneysfees and expenses for reasonable

1.4 15
lo
1-t

tt

incurred by Plaintiff in connectionwith the motion to compel.

l8 t9 20 21 22
z-)
aA

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: PHYLLISJ. HAMILTON HONORABLE District CourtJudse UnitedStates

25 26 27 28
O R D E RGRANTTNG PLAINTIFFF'SMOTION TO COMPELDISCOVERYRESPONSES FR O M DEFENDANTKOLMAR LABORATORIES, INC. AND FORMONETARY SANCTIONS PJH C A S ENO. CO5-02045