Hepting et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 237

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Tom Campbell re 234 Memorandum in Opposition, to AT&T Corp's Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related and Proposed Order (Pulgram, Laurence) (Filed on 6/16/2006)

Hepting et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Doc. 237

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

ANN BRICK (State Bar No. 65296) MARK SCHLOSBERG (State Bar No. 209144) NICOLE A. OZER (State Bar No. 228643) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 39 Drumm Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415/255-8437 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs (additional counsel listed on following page) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TASH HEPTING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AT&T CORP., et al., Defendants. TOM CAMPBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.

Case No. C-06-0672 VRW PROOF OF SERVICE

Case No. C-06-3596 VRW

PROOF OF SERVICE

CASE NO. C-06-0672 VRW
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

PETER ELIASBERG (State Bar No. 189110) CLARE PASTORE (State Bar No. 135933) ACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1616 Beverly Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90026 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 213/250-3919 [e-mail] [e-mail] DAVID BLAIR-LOY (State Bar No. 229235) ACLU FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO/IMPERIAL COUNTIES P.O. Box 87131 San Diego, CA 92138 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 619/232-0036 [e-mail] LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (State Bar No. 115163) JENNIFER L. KELLY (State Bar No. 193416) SAINA SHAMILOV (State Bar No. 215636) FENWICK & WEST LLP Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415/281-1350 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail]

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PROOF OF SERVICE

2

CASE NO. C-06-0672 VRW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

PROOF OF SERVICE I, Marsha Keeney-Burt, declare: I am a resident of the State of California and over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action; my business address is Embarcadero Center West, 275 Battery Street, Suite 1500, San Francisco, California 94111. On June 16, 2006, I served the within documents as noted below: 1. 2. OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFFS TOM CAMPBELL, ET AL., AND DENNIS P. RIORDAN, ET AL. TO AT&T CORP.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth below on this date by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at San Francisco, California addressed as set forth below. by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope and affixing a prepaid air bill, and causing the envelope to be delivered to a Federal Express agent for delivery. by causing the document(s) listed above to be personally delivered to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below. by causing to be transmitted via e-mail courtesy copies of the document(s) listed above to person(s) set forth below Riordan et al. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. USDC ND California No. C-06-3574-JSW Mark D. Flanagan Elizabeth I. Rogers Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] (By Facsimile and U.S. Mail) Attorneys for Defendant Verizon Communications Inc., a corporation

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PROOF OF SERVICE

3

CASE NO. C-06-0672 VRW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

John A. Rogovin Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006-3642 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 202/663-6363 [e-mail] (By U.S. Mail)

Attorneys for Defendant Verizon Communications Inc., a corporation

Roe et al. v. AT&T Corp. et al. USDC ND California No. C-06-3467-VRW Barry R. Himmelstein Eric B. Fastiff James M. Finberg Michael W. Sobol Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP 275 Battery Street 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415/956-1008 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] (By Hand Delivery) Attorneys for Plaintiffs Benson B. Roe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Paul Goltz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on June 16, 2006, at San Francisco, California.

s/Marsha Keeney-Burt Marsha Keeney-Burt

H9000/01545/SF/5171959.1

PROOF OF SERVICE

4

CASE NO. C-06-0672 VRW