Hepting et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 304

Memorandum in Opposition United States' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to File Supplementary Material filed byUnited States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Orleans, Renee) (Filed on 7/11/2006)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division CARL J. NICHOLS Deputy Assistant Attorney General DOUGLAS N. LETTER Terrorism Litigation Counsel JOSEPH H. HUNT Director, Federal Programs Branch ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Special Litigation Counsel [e-mail] RENÉE S. ORLEANS [e-mail] ANDREW H. TANNENBAUM [e-mail] Trial Attorneys U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20001 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for the United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) v. ) ) AT&T CORP., AT&T INC. and ) DOES 1-20, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS CAROLYN JEWEL and ERIK KNUTZEN on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated,

Case No. C-06-0672-VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Judge: The Hon. Vaughn R. Walker

PROPOSED ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL, Case No. C 06-0672-VRW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:

Plaintiffs have moved, pursuant Civil Local Rule 7-11, for an order allowing Plaintiffs to file supplementary material, in particular a USA Today newspaper article dated June 30, 2006. The United States opposes Plaintiffs' motion. The Court, having considered Plaintiffs' motion and the United States' opposition, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion is denied.

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker United States District Judge

PROPOSED ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL, Case No. C 06-0672-VRW

-2-