Hepting et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 34

Proposed Order REGARDING THE LODGING OF DOCUMENTS by Gregory Hicks, Erik Knutzen, Tash Hepting, Carolyn Jewel. (Kathrein, Reed) (Filed on 4/5/2006)

Download PDF
Hepting et al v. AT&T Corp. et al Doc. 34 1 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION CINDY COHN (145997) 2 cindy@eff.org LEE TIEN (148216) 3 tien@eff.org KURT OPSAHL (191303) 4 kurt@eff.org KEVIN S. BANKSTON (217026) 5 bankston@eff.org CORYNNE MCSHERRY (221504) 6 corynne@eff.org JAMES S. TYRE (083117) 7 jstyre@eff.org 454 Shotwell Street 8 San Francisco, CA 94110 Telephone: 415/436-9333 9 415/436-9993 (fax) 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 12 13 14 TRABER & VOORHEES BERT VOORHEES (137623) bv@tvlegal.com THERESA M. TRABER (116305) tmt@tvlegal.com 128 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 204 Pasadena, CA 91103 Telephone: 626/585-9611 626/ 577-7079 (fax) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C-06-0672-VRW CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE LODGING OF DOCUMENTS 15 TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS, ) CAROLYN JEWEL and ERIK KNUTZEN, on ) 16 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly ) Situated, ) 17 ) Plaintiffs, ) 18 ) vs. ) 19 ) AT&T CORP., et al. ) 20 ) Defendants. ) 21 ) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, and having considered the Plaintiffs' motion 2 and all responses thereto, and good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 3 1. No compelling reasons have been provided to justify the sealing of the documents 4 lodged with the Court; 5 2. All documents lodged with the Court to date in this matter shall be filed and available 6 to the public. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. THE HONORABLE VAUGHN R. WALKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE * * ORDER * 10 DATED: _________________________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VRW T:\CasesSF\AT&T Privacy\ORD00028999.doc [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE LODGING OF DOCUMENTS - C-06-0672- -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?