Hepting et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 378

CLERKS Letter Spreading Mandate to Counsel (gsa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2008)

H e p t i n g et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

D o c . 378

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F O R THE NINTH CIRCUIT

F IL E D
SEP 15 2008
M O L L Y C . D W YE R , C LE R K O F C O U R T U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S

T A S H HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself an d All Others Similarly Situated; G R E G O R Y HICKS; ERIK KNUTZEN, on B eh alf of Themselves and All Others S im ilarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL on B eh alf of Herself and All Others Similarly S itu ated BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs - Appellees, and W IR E D NEWS; CONDENET INC., Intervenors, v. A T & T CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellant, and A T & T , INC., Defendant, U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-intervenor.

N o . 06-17132 D .C . No. CV-06-00672-VRW N o rth e rn District of California, San F r a n c is c o

M ANDATE

T A S H HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself an d All Others Similarly Situated;

N o . 06-17137 D .C . No. CV-06-00672-VRW

Dockets.Justia.com

GREGORY HICKS; ERIK KNUTZEN, on B eh alf of Themselves and All Others S im ilarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL on B eh alf of Herself and All Others Similarly S itu ated BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. A T & T CORPORATION; AT&T, INC., Defendants, and U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-intervenor A p p e lla n t.

N o rth e rn District of California, San F r a n c is c o

M ANDATE

T h e judgment of this Court, entered 08/21/2008, takes effect this date. T h is constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 4 1 (a ) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

F O R THE COURT: M o lly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court

By: Theresa Benitez D ep u ty Clerk