Beauperthuy et al v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
Filing
446
STIPULATION AND ORDER continuing Motion to Compel Arbitration and Case Management Conference from 7/8/11 to 9/9/11 at 10:00 a.m.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 6/9/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JOHN C. KLOOSTERMAN, Bar No. 182625
email: jkloosterman@littler.com
LISA C. CHAGALA, Bar No. 217883
email: lchagala@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON
A Professional Corporation
650 California Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
Telephone: 415.433.1940
Attorneys for Defendants
24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC. AND SPORT AND
FITNESS CLUBS OF AMERICA
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
GABE BEAUPERTHUY, et al.,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
14
15
24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC. a
California corporation dba 24 HOUR
FITNESS; SPORT AND FITNESS
CLUBS OF AMERICA, INC., a California
corporation dba 24 HOUR FITNESS,
16
Defendants.
17
Case No. C 06 0715 SC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
CONTINUING (1) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL HEARING AND BRIEFING AND (2)
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
COMPLAINT FILED: February 1, 2006
TRIAL DATE: No date set.
18
RECITALS
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
A.
On April 25, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration to be heard at the
same time as the Case Management Conference at 10:00 a.m. on June 24, 2011;
B.
On May 2, 2011, Defendants moved to continue the hearing on the Motion to Compel
and Case Management Conference on the basis of the unavailability of Defense counsel;
C.
On May 9, 2011, the Court continued the hearing date on the Motion to Compel to
July 8, 2011;
D.
There is no trial date in this action;
1
E.
The parties have been conducting further meet and confer efforts and have agreed to a
2
face-to-face meeting to seek in good faith to resolve the arbitration issues concerning as many of the
3
Plaintiffs/Claimants as is reasonably possible;
4
5
6
F.
The parties’ meet and confer efforts have included new information produced by 24
Hour, which Plaintiffs’ counsel did not have prior to filing the Motion to Compel;
G.
The goal of the face-to-face meet and confer conference is to resolve, or at least
7
narrow the issues to be decided in the pending Motion to Compel and may alleviate the need for the
8
Court to address the issues;
9
H.
Given defense counsel’s international business-related travel schedule, the parties are
10
unable to meet and confer prior to the currently scheduled hearing of July 8, 2011. Therefore,
11
subject to the Court’s approval of this stipulation, the parties’ face-to-face meet and confer
12
conference is presently scheduled for August 1, 2011 at San Francisco, California;
13
I.
In light of the parties’ attempt to resolve the issues, the parties agree that the Motion
14
to Compel Arbitration and the Case Management Conference, subject to the Court’s approval, shall
15
be continued to a date after September 5, 2011 to allow the parties to resolve the or narrow the
16
arbitration issues at issue in the Motion to Compel and Defendants to respond to same.
STIPULATION
17
18
19
20
Without waiving any of their rights or positions or claims pertaining to issues relevant to the
arbitration or arbitration process, the parties hereby stipulate that:
1.
Counsel for the parties shall meet and confer face-to-face a good faith effort to
21
negotiate and resolve all issues related to arbitration and the pending Motion to
22
Compel;
23
2.
The conference shall take place August 1, 2011 in San Francisco;
3.
A client representative with full authority to negotiate all arbitration issues shall
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
attend in person or counsel for 24 Hour shall have full client authority to negotiate all
issues related to arbitration and the Motion to Compel without the need for client
approval;
1
4.
The pending Motion to Compel Arbitration and Case Management Conference shall
2
be continued from July 8, 2011 to September 5, 2011, or the next available hearing
3
date thereafter, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1.
4
5
SO STIPULATED:
Dated: June 8, 2011
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
6
7
By: _/s/ Laura Hayward___
John C. Kloosterman
Laura E. Hayward
Littler Mendelson, P.C., Attorneys for
Defendant
8
9
10
11
12
Dated: June 8, 2011
DONAHOO & ASSOCIATES
FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS, LLP
13
14
By: _/s/ Richard E. Donahoo____
Richard E. Donahoo
Thomas G. Foley, Jr.
Justin P. Karczag
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
15
16
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER
18
Upon reading the forgoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing, therefore,
19
IT IS ORDERED THAT,
20
5.
Counsel for the parties shall meet and confer face-to-face a good faith effort to
21
negotiate and resolve all issues related to arbitration and the pending Motion to
22
Compel;
23
6.
The conference shall take place August 1, 2011 in San Francisco;
7.
A client representative with full authority to negotiate all arbitration issues shall
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
attend in person or counsel for 24 Hour shall have full client authority to negotiate all
issues related to arbitration and the Motion to Compel without the need for client
approval;
1
The pending Motion to Compel Arbitration and Case Management Conference shall be
2
continued from July 8, 2011 to September 9, 2011, or the next available hearing date
3
thereafter, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1.
4
ER
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
A
H
12
R NIA
Judge S
RT
11
onti
amuel C
NO
10
FO
9
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
LI
8
S DISTRIC
TC
TE
__________________________________
TA
THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI
RT
U
O
7
6/9/11
Dated: ________________
S
6
The briefing schedule shall be pursuant to statute. IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?