Mussen v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. et al

Filing 45

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 44 Stipulation filed by Sharon Mussen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/28/11. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2011)

1

4

RICHARD P. DUANE (SBN 37880)
DIANE STANTON (SBN 142196)
DUANE & SELTZER, LLP
2000 Center Street, Suite 300
Berkeley, CA 94704
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff SHARON MUSSEN

2
3

6
7
8

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT

9

OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO

11
12
SHARON MUSSEN,

Case No. C06-01000 MHP

13
14

STIPULATED DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
and
(Proposed) ORDER

Plaintiff,

15

vs.

16
17

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN,
INC., KAISER FOUNDATION MEDICAL
GROUP, INC., and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive,

18

_____________________________________/

19
20

WHEREAS, Plaintiff SHARON MUSSEN, is deceased, and her father and representative,
IRWIN MUSSEN is also deceased. The purpose of the litigation no longer exists.

21

WHEREAS, the parties mutually agree to dismiss the case with prejudice, with each side to

22

bear its own costs. Each side agrees to waive any claim against the other that may have arisen from

23

this litigation.

24

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

25

DUANE & SELTZER, LLP

26
27

//s//
____________________________
RICHARD P. DUANE
Attorney for Plaintiff

____________________
Dated

28
____________________________________
STIPULATION DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
MUSSEN V. KAISER; US DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. C06-01000 MHP

-1-

1
MARION’S INN
2
3

//s//
_____________________________
MARK PALLEY, ESQ.
Attorney for Defendant

_____________________
Dated

4
5
6

Based on the Stipulation between the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

7

This action is dismissed with prejudice. Each side to bear its own costs.

8

Each side to waive any claim against the other that may have arisen from this litigation.

9

SO ORDERED.

S

RT

14

R NIA

dwa
Judge E

ER

16

A

H

15

hen

rd M. C

NO

13

FO

12

_______________________________________
ERED
O ORD
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
IT IS S
DISTRICT

LI

12/28/11
Dated: _________________

UNIT
ED

11

RT
U
O

10

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
____________________________________
STIPULATION DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
MUSSEN V. KAISER; US DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. C06-01000 MHP

-2-

C